Correlation between anxiety and decreased quality of life in patients with non-esophageal eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases.

Background and Aim: Mental status such as anxiety and depression in patients with non-esophageal eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (non-EoE EGIDs) has not been studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether patients with non-EoE EGIDs had mental disorders and decreased mental-health-related quality of life (QOL) similar to those in patients with disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). Methods: We enrolled patients with non-EoE EGIDs and DGBI visiting the Osaka Metropolitan University Hospital, and the measures listed below were compared between the groups. We collected data using the following questionnaires: hospital anxiety and depression scale, and short form (SF)-8 including mental component summary (MCS)-8. Results: We evaluated 21 and 17 patients with non-EoE EGIDs and DGBI, respectively. The anxiety score was not significantly different between the groups. The proportion of patients with possible anxiety was not significantly different between the groups (19.0% vs 33.3%). These results show that patients with non-EoE EGIDs had anxiety that might be equivalent to that of patients with DGBI. The depression score and proportion of patients with possible depression in the non-EoE EGID group tended to be lower than those in the DGBI group. MCS-8 scores were not significantly different between the non-EoE EGID and DGBI groups, which might imply an equivalent decrease in mental-health-related QOL in both groups of patients. In patients with non-EoE EGIDs, the anxiety score had a significant inverse association with the MCS-8 score. Conclusions: Patients with non-EoE EGIDs may have anxiety that correlates with decreased mental-health-related QOL.

Belching Disorders and Rumination Syndrome: A Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Belching disorders and rumination syndrome (RS) are disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBIs) in Rome IV. Belching disorders are composed of excessive gastric belching (GB) and supragastric belching (SGB). Excessive GB is related to physiological phenomenon whereas excessive SGB and RS are behavioral disorders. SUMMARY: A recent large internet survey found that prevalence of belching disorders and RS were 1% and 2.8%, respectively. It has been recognized that not a few patients with two behavioral disorders, excessive SGB and RS, could be misdiagnosed as proton pump inhibitors (PPI)-refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In patients with reflux symptoms, distinguishing these conditions is essential because they need psychological treatment (i.e., cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) rather than acid suppressants. Clinicians should take a medical history meticulously first to identify possible excessive SGB and/or RS. High-resolution impedance manometry and/or 24-h impedance-pH monitoring can offer an objective diagnosis of the disorders. Several therapeutic options are available for excessive SGB and RS. The first-line therapy should be CBT using diaphragmatic breathing that can stop the behaviors involving complex muscle contraction (e.g., abdominal straining) to generate SGB or rumination. Overlap with eating disorders and/or other DGBIs such as functional dyspepsia can make management of the behavioral disorders challenging since such coexisting conditions often require additional treatments. KEY MESSAGES: Excessive SGB and RS are not unusual conditions. It is important to raise awareness of the behavioral disorders for appropriate management.

Superficial oesophageal mucosal innervation may contribute to severity of symptoms in oesophageal motility disorders.

BACKGROUND: Mechanisms underlying perception of dysphagia and chest pain have not been completely elucidated, although oesophageal mucosal afferent nerves might play an important role. AIMS: To evaluate the relationship between oesophageal mucosal afferent nerves and the severity of dysphagia and chest pain in oesophageal motility disorders. METHODS: We prospectively recruited patients with oesophageal motility disorders having dysphagia and/or chest pain from whom oesophageal biopsies were obtained. High-resolution manometry classified patients into disorders of oesophagogastric junction (OGJ) outflow and disorders of peristalsis. Symptom severity was assessed using validated questionnaires including Brief Oesophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire (BEDQ). Immunohistochemistry was performed on oesophageal biopsies to evaluate the location of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-immunoreactive mucosal afferent nerves. Findings were compared to existing data from 10 asymptomatic healthy volunteers. RESULTS: Of 79 patients, 61 patients had disorders of OGJ outflow and 18 had disorders of peristalsis. CGRP-immunoreactive mucosal nerves were more superficially located in the mucosa of patients with oesophageal motility disorders compared to healthy volunteers. Within disorders of OGJ outflow, the location of CGRP-immunoreactive nerves negatively correlated with BEDQ score both in the proximal (ρ = -0.567, p < 0.001) and distal oesophagus (ρ = -0.396, p = 0.003). In the proximal oesophagus, strong chest pain was associated with more superficially located mucosal nerves than weak chest pain (p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis showed superficial nerves in the proximal oesophagus was independently associated with severe dysphagia in disorders of OGJ outflow (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Superficial location of mucosal nerves in the proximal oesophagus might contribute to symptoms, especially severe dysphagia, in disorders of OGJ outflow.

The impact of COVID-19 on Japanese patients with eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders during the vaccination era.

Background: Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs) are chronic allergic diseases categorized as eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and non-EoE EGIDs. Few studies regarding the association between EGIDs and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been reported. Although most Japanese individuals received the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine, the incidence of COVID-19 remained high in 2022. This study examines the incidence of COVID-19 in patients with EGIDs during the vaccination era. Methods: Patients with EGIDs who visited our department between October and December 2022 were enrolled in the study. The incidence and severity of COVID-19 prior to October 1, 2022 were determined. Patients who reported having COVID-19 also reported their hospitalization history, intensive care unit admissions, and EGID flares. The number of SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations received and treatment for EGIDs were obtained from the patients' medical records. Results: Of 111 patients with EGIDs (65 with EoE and 46 with non-EoE EGIDs) included in this study, 31 (28%) patients reported having COVID-19, including 14 (22%) with EoE and 17 (37%) with non-EoE EGIDs. Fifty-nine (84%) patients received two or more vaccinations, and 11 (16%) patients received no vaccinations. COVID-19 was mild in all but one patient who had moderate symptoms. COVID-19 was not associated with EGID flares. EGID treatments and an unvaccinated status were not associated with an increased risk of COVID-19. Conclusion: COVID-19 was mild in patients with EGIDs and not associated with EGIDs flares during the vaccination era. There was a relatively high incidence of COVID-19 among patients with non-EoE EGIDs.

Responses of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers According to Outcomes of Symptom, Endoscopy, and Histology in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

GOALS: We aimed to examine the response rate to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and potassium-competitive acid blockers and the prevalence of topical corticosteroid (TCS) therapy as the second-line treatment for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). BACKGROUND: Acid-suppressive drugs such as PPIs and potassium-competitive acid blockers are often used to treat EoE. Treatment response is based on outcomes including symptoms, endoscopy, and histology; however, the detailed response rate to PPI/P-CAB is unknown. STUDY: In total, 236 patients with histologically confirmed EoE who received PPI/P-CAB as the first-line treatment were included. We assessed the symptoms, endoscopic reference score (EREFS), and histology [eosinophils per high-power field (eos/hpf)] 8 weeks after PPI/P-CAB administration. Complete normalization was defined as the disappearance of symptoms, EREFS score 0, or 0-1 eos/hpf, and response as disappearance or improvement of symptoms, EREFS score ≤2, or <15 eos/hpf. The prevalence of TCS therapy in each response group was assessed. RESULTS: Complete normalization was achieved in 25%, 50%, 36%, and 8% of patients for symptoms, endoscopy, histology, and all 3 outcomes, respectively. The response rates were 81%, 87%, 87%, 75%, and 60% for symptoms, endoscopy, histology, and all 3 outcomes, respectively. TCS use was significantly lower (8%) in patients who achieved response of all 3 outcomes than in other groups and was dependent on the number of outcomes with nonresponse. CONCLUSIONS: Complete normalization of symptoms, endoscopy, and histology using PPI/P-CAB is uncommon. Based on treatment efficacy by response/nonresponse, TCS was the secondary treatment in cases with an increase in the number of nonresponse outcomes.

Prevalence of elderly eosinophilic esophagitis and their clinical characteristics.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is predominantly found in middle-aged men among adults. There are few reports about EoE in the elderly, despite an ageing population. The study aimed to define the prevalence and clinical characteristics of EoE amongst older adults. METHODS: Elderly patients (defined as those ≥65 years) were compared to younger adults (18-64) in terms of clinical characteristics (age, gender, presenting symptoms, comorbidities), histological activity (eosinophil count), treatment modality and response to treatment. A pre- existing prospectively generated database of all EoE patients presenting to our department between February 2010 and December 2022 was interrogated. 309 patients who underwent endoscopy and esophageal biopsy and were found to have ≥15 eosinophils/HPF were defined as having EoE and were included for study. Statistical analyses were performed using Fisher's extract test or Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: 309 cases of EoE were recorded, mean age 45.7, range (21-88 years), of which20 patients were aged 65 years and over. Compared to younger patients, those aged ≥65 had more medical comorbidities (15 [75%] vs 111[38%], p = 0.002), and instead a non-significant trend toward less fibrosis (0.25 vs 0.46, p = 0.117). Although rate of cases required topical steroid (TCS) therapy was similar, none received repeated or maintenance TCS therapy in elderly. CONCLUSION: In our cohort, only 20 patients (6%) were aged 65 years or older, suggesting that EoE is uncommon in the elderly. The clinical characteristics of EoE in the older age group were similar to the younger patients. Future studies with prospective data collection may determine if EoE disappears with age, or if the younger mean age is reflective of an increasing prevalence in recent years, that may be realized in the elderly EoE population in the future.

How to recognize and treat rumination syndrome.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Rumination syndrome (RS) is a functional gastroduodenal disorder characterized by repeated effortless regurgitation or vomiting of recently ingested food without retching. RS generally has been considered a rare entity. However, it has been increasingly recognized that many RS patients are likely to be underdiagnosed. This review discusses how to recognize and manage RS patients in clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS: A recent epidemiological study that included over 50,000 individuals found that the prevalence of RS around the world is 3.1%. In patients with proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-refractory reflux symptoms, postprandial high-resolution manometry combined with impedance (HRM/Z) reveals that RS accounts for up to 20% of those cases. HRM/Z can be a gold standard for objective RS diagnosis. In addition, off-PPI 24-h impedance pH monitoring can suggest the possibility of RS when it reveals frequent postprandial, non-acid reflux with a high symptom index. Modulated cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) targeting secondary psychological maintaining mechanisms almost eliminates regurgitation. SUMMARY: The prevalence of RS is higher than generally thought. For patients suspected of RS, HRM/Z is useful to distinguish RS from gastroesophageal reflux disease. CBT can be a highly effective therapeutic option.

Esophageal Reflux Hypersensitivity: A Comprehensive Review.

Reflux hypersensitivity (RH) is one of the phenotypes of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The latest Rome IV defines RH as a condition with typical reflux symptoms and positive reflux-symptom association despite normal acid exposure. Subsequently, the Lyon consensus proposed detailed cutoff values for the criteria on the basis of experts' consensus. Rome IV brought a clear-cut perspective into the pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease and the importance of esophageal hypersensitivity. This perspective can be supported by the fact that other functional gastrointestinal disorders such as irritable bowel syndrome and functional dyspepsia often overlap with RH. Although several possible pathophysiological mechanisms of esophageal hypersensitivity have been identified, there is still unmet medical needs in terms of treatment for this condition. This review summarizes the current knowledge regarding RH.

Esophageal mast cells may be associated with the perception of symptoms in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a type 2 helper T-cell (Th2)-mediated allergic disease that involves mast cells. This study aimed to clarify the relationship between perception of symptoms and mast cell levels in patients with EoE. METHODS: We enrolled patients with asymptomatic esophageal eosinophilia (aEE) and those with symptomatic EoE. Immunofluorescence staining was performed on esophageal biopsy specimens to quantify mast cell-related molecules, such as tryptase, proteinase-activated receptor (PAR)-2, and vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor (VPAC)-1. RESULTS: We evaluated 28 and 58 patients with aEE and EoE, respectively. There were no significant differences in clinical and endoscopic features and peak eosinophil counts between both groups. Mast cell tryptase-positive areas were significantly higher in EoE than in aEE (4.9 [3.5-6.2] vs. 2.0 [1.2-3.4] %, p < 0.01). The number of PAR-2-positive cells was significantly higher in EoE than in aEE (14 [8.8-20.0] vs. 4 [2.8-8.0] cells/high-power field [HPF], p < 0.01). The number of VPAC-1-positive cells was significantly higher in the EoE group than in the aEE group (13 [8.8-16.0] vs. 6 [3.0-9.3] cells/HPF, p < 0.01). A positive correlation was observed between the numbers of PAR-2-positive cells and VPAC-1-positive cells (r = 0.851, p < 0.01). Moreover, mast cell tryptase-positive areas positively correlated with the number of PAR-2- and VPAC-1-positive cells (r = 0.352, p < 0.01; r = 0.355, p < 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal mast cells and their receptors, PAR-2 and VPAC-1, may contribute to the perception of symptoms in patients with EoE.

Two families with gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach (GAPPS): case reports and literature review.

Background: Gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach (GAPPS), a hereditary gastric polyposis syndrome that presents with fundic gastric polyposis, is associated with an increased risk of gastric adenocarcinoma. The four patterns of point mutation in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) promoter 1B region have been identified as the cause of GAPPS. GAPPS was first reported in 2012, and only 33 families with GAPPS have been reported worldwide to date. Therefore, the clinical management for GAPPS are still controversial. We herein report two unrelated GAPPS families with the same point mutation site. Case Description: Total seven patients of two families had >100 carpeting polyps in the gastric body and fundus, and one of them (69-year-old female) had gastric adenocarcinoma. As a result of germline analysis, both families harbored a point mutation (c.-192A>G) in APC promoter 1B region, previously reported in only one family. Three of seven patients underwent total gastrectomy, and others were followed-up with regular esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and biopsy every 6 months. To summarize the reported cases, total 42 patients of 35 families have developed gastric adenocarcinoma. Conclusions: This report may contribute to determining the appropriate guidelines for the clinical practice of GAPPS. When EGD reveals gastric polyposis localized to the gastric body and fundus, it is important to obtain a detailed family history and perform germline mutational analysis. And more, point mutation type of our family cases was a rare pattern, suggested that c.-192A>G pattern might be a pathogenic variant.

[Current real-world treatments for Japanese patients with eosinophilic esophagitis].

A total of 306 patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) were analyzed at our department. Proton pump inhibitors or potassium-competitive acid blockers were used as the first-line treatment in 286 (93.5%) patients. Fifty-five (18.0%) patients received topical steroid swallowing therapy. During 17.7-month mean follow-up, 46.4% of the patients were followed-up with no medications, 37.3% of the patients received maintenance or on-demand therapy using acid-suppressive drugs, and 9.8% of the patients received maintenance therapy with steroid swallowing. The majority of patients with EoE were treated using a therapeutic strategy similar to that used for gastroesophageal reflux disease. However, some patients were refractory to the treatment. Current real-world treatment strategies for Japanese patients with EoE are clarified.

Effect of hiatus hernia on reflux patterns and mucosal integrity in patients with non-erosive reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Hiatus hernia (HH) contributes to development of gastroesophageal reflux disease, Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. This study was aimed to investigate the influence of HH on reflux patterns and distal esophageal mucosal integrity in non-erosive reflux disease (NERD). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed PPI-refractory NERD patients referred to three tertiary referral centers who underwent high-resolution manometry and off-PPI 24-h impedance-pH monitoring (with or without bile spectrophotometry). Patients with HH ≥2 cm (HH group, n = 42) or no HH (non-HH group, n = 40) with similar esophageal acid exposure time (AET 6%-12%) were included. KEY RESULTS: Age, gender, BMI, esophageal motility, AET, and esophageal clearance were similar between the two groups. The HH group had higher numbers of total reflux episodes (p = 0.015) with similar proportion of acid/non-acid reflux compared with the non-HH group. Mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) in the distal esophagus was significantly lower in the HH group than the non-HH group at both 5 cm (p = 0.002) and 3 cm (p = 0.015) above the lower esophageal sphincter. Multivariable regression analysis showed that HH, less non-acid reflux and lower post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index (PSPWI) were independently associated with lower MNBI. Among 31 patients tested with bile spectrophotometry, the HH group had significantly longer bile exposure time than the non-HH group (p = 0.011), and bile reflux inversely and significantly correlated with MNBI (rho = -0.75, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Hiatus hernia, less non-acid reflux and lower PSPWI were associated with lower MNBI. HH impairs distal esophageal mucosal integrity, the mechanism of which we speculate to be through excessive bile reflux.

Esophageal mucosal sensory nerves and potential mechanoreceptors in patients with ineffective esophageal motility.

BACKGROUND: Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is the most common motility disorder. However, little is known about its pathophysiology. Vagal afferent nerves convey esophageal intraluminal bolus information to solitary nucleus, which is likely to be involved with esophageal primary and secondary peristalsis (SP). We hypothesized that altered mucosal sensory afferents underlie the pathogenesis of IEM. METHODS: We prospectively collected esophageal biopsies from 38 patients with proton pump inhibitor-refractory reflux symptoms from January to December 2019. All patients underwent high-resolution manometry for the evaluation of primary and secondary peristalsis, and off-PPI 24-h impedance-pH studies. Biopsies were analyzed using immunohistochemistry for identification of calcitonin gene-related peptide-immunoreactive (CGRP-IR) nerves and qPCR for mRNA expression of potential mechanoreceptors. KEY RESULTS: Overall 32 patients were finally analyzed which consisted of 11 patients with normal motility and 21 patients with IEM. The position of mucosal CGRP-IR nerves from the esophageal lumen did not differ between the two groups (the proximal esophagus (p = 0.52), the mid-esophagus (p = 0.92), the distal esophagus (p = 0.29)) with the similar reflux profile. No difference was seen in the position of CGRP-IR nerves between patients with successful triggering of SP and those unable to trigger SP. There was also no difference in mRNA expression of each potential mechanoreceptors (TRPA1, TRPV1, TRPV4, ASIC1, ASIC3) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Our study showed that mucosal sensory afferents nerve position and mRNA expression of potential mechanoreceptors did not correlate to weak esophageal contraction.

Belching in children: Prevalence and association with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Excessive belching is frequently reported in adult patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) and dyspepsia. Although postprandial gastric belching (GB) is considered a physiological mechanism for gastric venting, supra-gastric belching (SGB) is considered a distinct behavioural disorder. We aimed to define the prevalence of different types of belching and its association with reflux disease in paediatric patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed reflux monitoring studies from 287 patients (median age: 7.0 years; interquartile range 3.0-11.3 years) with a suspicion of GORD. Based on oesophageal acid exposure time (AET) patients were divided in 3 groups: (a) physiological AET, (b) borderline AET and (c) pathological AET. MII-pH studies were manually edited and reflux disease parameters were measured together with quantification of GB and SGB. KEY RESULTS: Two hundred one children (70.0%) had physiological AET (median: 0.8; interquartile range 0.3-1.6), 52 (18.1%) had borderline AET (median: 4.2; interquartile range 3.4-5.3) and 34 (11.9%) had pathologic AET (median: 10.7; interquartile range 9.1-14.2). Gastric belching was observed in all studies. Gastric belching related reflux was more frequently observed in patients with borderline and pathological AET (p < 0.001). This was more common in older children. SGB were observed in only 7 (2.4%) children (age range: 8-17years) in our population and all patients had Physiological AET. Only 3 (1%) patients had pathological number of SGB (>13/24 h). CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Gastric belching related reflux is observed in children with increased AET. SGB is very rare in the paediatric population.

A case series of sublingual immunotherapy-induced eosinophilic esophagitis: stop or spit.

We experienced six cases with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). They complained of dysphagia, heartburn, or retrosternal discomfort. Endoscopy revealed typical findings of EoE and biopsy examination showed significant eosinophil infiltration in the esophageal epithelium. They received sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for allergic rhinitis. Discontinuation or spit method during SLIT resulted in improvement of symptoms, and endoscopic and histological remission. Previously six cases with SLIT-induced EoE has been reported. Our case series suggest that SLIT is clearly associated with the development of EoE by entering of aeroallergens from the luminal side of the esophagus and spit method during SLIT might be one of the therapeutic options for SLIT-induced EoE.

Heartburn sensation in nonerosive reflux disease: pattern of superficial sensory nerves expressing TRPV1 and epithelial cells expressing ASIC3 receptors.

The underlying causes of heartburn, characteristic symptom of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), remain incompletely understood. Superficial afferent innervation of the esophageal mucosa in nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) may drive nociceptive reflux perception, but its acid-sensing role has not yet been established. Transient receptor potential vanilloid subfamily member-1 (TRPV1), transient receptor potential melastatin 8 (TRPM8), and acid-sensing ion channel 3 (ASIC3) are regulators of sensory nerve activity and could be important reflux-sensing receptors within the esophageal mucosa. We characterized TRPV1, TRPM8, and ASIC3 expression in esophageal mucosa of patients with GERD. We studied 10 patients with NERD, 10 with erosive reflux disease (ERD), 7 with functional heartburn (FH), and 8 with Barrett's esophagus (BE). Biopsies obtained from the distal esophageal mucosa were costained with TRPV1, TRPM8, or ASIC3, and CGRP, CD45, or E-cadherin. RNA expression of TRPV1, TRPM8, and ASIC3 was assessed using qPCR. Patients with NERD had significantly increased expression of TRPV1 on superficial sensory nerves compared with ERD (P = 0.028) or BE (P = 0.017). Deep intrapapillary nerve endings did not express TRPV1 in all phenotypes studied. ASIC3 was exclusively expressed on epithelial cells most significantly in patients with NERD and ERD (P ≤0.0001). TRPM8 was expressed on submucosal CD45+ leukocytes. Superficial localization of TRPV1-immunoreactive nerves in NERD, and increased ASIC3 coexpression on epithelial cells in NERD and ERD, suggests a mechanism for heartburn sensation. Esophageal epithelial cells may play a sensory role in acid reflux perception and act interdependently with TRPV1-expressing mucosal nerves to augment hypersensitivity in patients with NERD, raising the enticing possibility of topical antagonists for these ion channels as a therapeutic option.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We demonstrate for the first time that increased pain perception in patients with nonerosive reflux disease likely results from expression of acid-sensitive channels on superficial mucosal afferents and esophageal epithelial cells, raising the potential for topical therapy.

Vonoprazan shows efficacy similar to that of proton pump inhibitors with respect to symptomatic, endoscopic, and histological responses in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic allergic disease with esophageal symptoms and intraepithelial eosinophil infiltration. Effects of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) on EoE have not been elucidated. We aimed to examine and compare the effects of P-CABs and PPIs on symptomatic, endoscopic, and histological responses of patients with EoE. METHODS: We analyzed 118 EoE patients who received PPI or P-CAB therapy with rabeprazole 10 mg (RPZ10, N = 22), rabeprazole 20 mg (RPZ20, N = 34), esomeprazole 20 mg (EPZ20, N = 25), or vonoprazan 20 mg (VPZ20, N = 33). We evaluated symptomatic responses by classifying the patients into three groups: complete relief, partial relief, and no change. Endoscopic responses were evaluated using the endoscopic reference score (EREFS) following PPI or P-CAB therapy. Histological responses were evaluated by determining eosinophil counts in esophageal biopsy samples and classifying the patients into two groups: complete remission [0/1 eosinophil/high-power field (eos/HPF)] and remission (< 15 eos/HPF). RESULTS: There were no differences among the therapy groups in terms of clinical characteristics, endoscopic findings, and histological findings of the patients before treatment. The rate of complete relief in clinical symptoms was 54.5% in the RPZ10 group, 64.7% in the RPZ20 group, 72.0% in the EPZ20 group, and 75.7% in the VPZ20 group. There were no significant differences in the therapeutic effect among the therapy groups. Similarly, endoscopic and histological complete remission rates were not significantly different among the therapy groups. CONCLUSIONS: Vonoprazan showed similar efficacy to PPIs in EoE.